Skip to content

Conversation

@bootjp
Copy link
Owner

@bootjp bootjp commented Aug 30, 2025

Summary

  • introduce ShardedTransactionManager to route requests to raft groups using distribution engine
  • add tests verifying multi-shard commits across separate raft groups

Testing

  • go test ./...
  • golangci-lint run ./... (fails: can't load config: the Go language version (go1.24) used to build golangci-lint is lower than the targeted Go version (1.25.0))

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_68b1f48d88188324ba20fe70179ff57e

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @bootjp, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a ShardedTransactionManager to provide robust multi-Raft support, allowing the system to distribute and manage transactions across various Raft consensus groups. This enhancement is crucial for scaling the key-value store by sharding data and operations, ensuring that requests are efficiently routed to the correct shard for processing.

Highlights

  • Introduction of ShardedTransactionManager: A new component designed to route transaction requests to different Raft groups based on key distribution.
  • Multi-Raft Support: This manager enables the system to handle transactions across multiple independent Raft consensus groups, facilitating sharding.
  • Comprehensive Testing: New tests have been added to verify the correct routing and commitment of requests across separate Raft groups.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a ShardedTransactionManager to handle requests across multiple Raft groups. The implementation correctly routes requests based on key ranges. However, there are some critical areas for improvement. The most significant issue is that the Commit method does not provide atomicity across shards, which can lead to data inconsistency in case of partial failures. I've recommended implementing a two-phase commit (2PC) protocol to address this. Additionally, I've pointed out code duplication between the Commit and Abort methods and suggested a refactoring. Finally, I've recommended enhancing the tests to cover failure scenarios to ensure the system's robustness.

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Codex Review: Here are some suggestions.

Reply with @codex fix comments to fix any unresolved comments.

About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you open a pull request for review, mark a draft as ready, or comment "@codex review". If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex fix this CI failure" or "@codex address that feedback".

)

// helper to create a multi-node raft cluster and return the leader
func newTestRaft(t *testing.T, id string, fsm raft.FSM) (*raft.Raft, func()) {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚫 [golangci] reported by reviewdog 🐶
calculated cyclomatic complexity for function newTestRaft is 14, max is 10 (cyclop)

@bootjp bootjp merged commit 5787514 into main Aug 30, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
@bootjp bootjp deleted the codex/investigate-issue-#78-in-elastickv branch August 30, 2025 15:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants