-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Add sharded transaction manager for multi-Raft support #224
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @bootjp, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request introduces a ShardedTransactionManager to provide robust multi-Raft support, allowing the system to distribute and manage transactions across various Raft consensus groups. This enhancement is crucial for scaling the key-value store by sharding data and operations, ensuring that requests are efficiently routed to the correct shard for processing.
Highlights
- Introduction of ShardedTransactionManager: A new component designed to route transaction requests to different Raft groups based on key distribution.
- Multi-Raft Support: This manager enables the system to handle transactions across multiple independent Raft consensus groups, facilitating sharding.
- Comprehensive Testing: New tests have been added to verify the correct routing and commitment of requests across separate Raft groups.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a ShardedTransactionManager to handle requests across multiple Raft groups. The implementation correctly routes requests based on key ranges. However, there are some critical areas for improvement. The most significant issue is that the Commit method does not provide atomicity across shards, which can lead to data inconsistency in case of partial failures. I've recommended implementing a two-phase commit (2PC) protocol to address this. Additionally, I've pointed out code duplication between the Commit and Abort methods and suggested a refactoring. Finally, I've recommended enhancing the tests to cover failure scenarios to ensure the system's robustness.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Codex Review: Here are some suggestions.
Reply with @codex fix comments to fix any unresolved comments.
About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you open a pull request for review, mark a draft as ready, or comment "@codex review". If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex fix this CI failure" or "@codex address that feedback".
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| // helper to create a multi-node raft cluster and return the leader | ||
| func newTestRaft(t *testing.T, id string, fsm raft.FSM) (*raft.Raft, func()) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚫 [golangci] reported by reviewdog 🐶
calculated cyclomatic complexity for function newTestRaft is 14, max is 10 (cyclop)
Summary
ShardedTransactionManagerto route requests to raft groups using distribution engineTesting
go test ./...golangci-lint run ./...(fails: can't load config: the Go language version (go1.24) used to build golangci-lint is lower than the targeted Go version (1.25.0))https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_68b1f48d88188324ba20fe70179ff57e